Nothing frightfully interesting this week, except the dream where I was controlling the man-eating plant. Too bad insectivorous plants are incapable of digesting flesh in real life, and will get sick if you try to feed them meat (as many people will recommend doing -- perish the thought!).
I am not typically much of a television person. There are several reasons for this:
1. I enjoy long, overarching storylines but am too busy/scatterbrained to catch every episode. I cannot stand seeing a recap that would spoil a previous episode, so once I miss one episode, that series is toast.
2. Books and television share a similarity: most of the work out there is hopeless formulaic yam-trappery averageness that people will buy every week, like eggs. The difference with books is that one can select the quality product (or not, in the case of the general book-reading, TV-watching public) to be consumed, then consume it at a convenient time -- even for free at a public library! Television, on the other hand, is doled out in specific time slots, and it is not until much, much later along the spectrum of production that a DVD or similar may be purchased or checked out or rented for convenient consumption.
Much of television watching is "What's on right now?", with purchasing only happening if the series is especially good. We let ourselves get stuck into ruts of mediocre series just because they're on at the time that we decide to gel, and that is that.
Which brings me to internet television. I have essentially given up on "traditional television" at this point, but I can see that internet TV, while impressive, is still not quite where it could be. Networks still want their main business to be on traditional sets because presumably this can net more advertising money -- people are more patient with commercial breaks when they're watching on a television set, for one.
Yet, to keep people coming back to the traditional mode, their strategy seems to be to offer online content, but cripple it a little (in the grand scheme of internet media). Rather than taking advantage of the medium, the infinite time slots, they choose to offer 5 episodes. One season. Rolling coverage, come back next month for the rest.
Reminds me of the graphics card processing at a certain company. Rather than have, say, 3 different production lines for 3 models of the product, the cards are all produced to the highest specifications. Then, to provide lower-tier models of the card for different markets, some of the high-quality cards are set aside and "fixed" -- parts of the circuitry fused so the performance is slashed.
There's a visceral discomfort to that. But TV execs, graphics cards manufacturers, perhaps they are simply acting in the most profitable way they can.
Reality check. Part of my frustration comes from a show that I enjoy watching online, but that only offers season 1 at this point. The thing that really gets me is that the show was CANCELED on traditional television after the second season, so how exactly would showing it online hurt the network??
Reality check. Part of my frustration comes from a show that I enjoy watching online, but that only offers season 1 at this point. The thing that really gets me is that the show was CANCELED on traditional television after the second season, so how exactly would showing it online hurt the network??

